Roe v. Wade Overturned! Eat That, Sonia Sotomayor! (Fri. 6-24-22)

Historic day for unborn babies! Obama's Latina "Justice," Chase bank, FL synagogues, and Planned Parenthood are mad! 

The Hake Report, Friday, June 24, 2022 AD: Supreme Court this week protected gun rights against violations by New York // Today the Supreme Court struck down Roe v. Wade! // FLASHBACK: Obama "Justice" Sonia Sotomayor vs. Mississippi Solicitor General on the notion of fetal "viability," and other mess! // INTERESTING CALLS: Should we push contraception or abstinence? It's a private decision between a woman and her doctor! Chase bank funds women's travel to pro-choice states! // Liberal synagogue sues Florida over 15-week ban! // Oklahoma theater sign taken down, warning about Disney's "Lightyear" movie featuring vulgar lesbian "same-sex" kiss. // 

MUSIC: "Bboy" - The Hidden Cameras - Mississauga Goddam (2003, Rough Trade) // "Get Yer Glow" - Dan Lebowitz - YouTube Audio Library (Chris selection) // 

CALLERS

Jerry in TX says he had sex at 11, and encourages contraception! // 

Richard in SF, CA thinks it's a woman's right, not a man's! // 

Jeff in LA says JPMorgan Chase will fund employee abortion travel! // 

Shane in Newfoundland, Canada criticizes Richard and Chase — stay in a liberal state, killers! // 

Ramon in CA might have claimed abortion reduces crime, but he got disconnected. // 

TIME STAMPS

• 0:00:00 Fri, Jun 24, 2022

• 0:02:58 Hey, guys! Better… not bitter.

• 0:05:21 Gun rights vs. NY

• 0:08:55 Roe v. Wade struck down! Sonia Sotomayor, boo!

• 0:25:37 JERRY, TX: Support/oppose contraception?

• 0:37:46 RICHARD, SF: Woman and her doctor

• 0:47:18 JEFF, LA: Chase bank funds travel for it!

• 0:50:32 SHANE, CANADA: Stay in that liberal state!

• 0:55:52 Sex has been perverted / Jewish lawsuit in FL

• 0:59:39 "Bboy" - The Hidden Cameras

• 1:02:41 Reading chat after music

• 1:03:48 Supers: SCOTUS, women, life at conception

• 1:07:51 Wash. Compost: politicized courts, "science"

• 1:26:27 Lightyear's "gay" kiss warning

• 1:33:05 Synagogue sues FL over pro-life law

• 1:44:07 Super: True science from God

• 1:45:07 Sonia Sotomayor again: Latina work harder

• 1:52:51 Hake's cop friend posthumously promoted

• 1:54:57 RAMON, CA: Bad phone, disconnected

• 1:55:58 Abortion access reduces crime? 

• 1:57:06 Catch The Fallen State, Nickstream

• 1:57:47 "Get Yer Glow" - Dan Lebowitz

Also see Hake News from JLP. 

HAKE LINKS

VIDEO: YouTube* | Facebook | Twitter | LIVE Odysee | DLive | Twitch* | ARCHIVE Odysee | BitChute | Rumble 

PODCAST: Apple | Spotify* | Podplayer | Castbox | TuneIn | Stitcher | Google | iHeart | Amazon | PodBean 

SUPER CHAT: Streamlabs | Odysee | EXCLUSIVE SUPPORT: SubscribeStar | Teespring 

CALL-IN: 888-775-3773, LIVE M-F 9-11 AM PT (Los Angeles) thehakereport.com/show 

*NOTE: Liberal platforms commonly censor Hake's content. 

BLOG POST 

SHOW NOTES

Friday! 

GUNS

 The US Supreme Court strikes down New York gun law restricting concealed carry / Twitter 

ABORTIONS

(Far-left Twitter) US Supreme Court strikes down landmark abortion decision Roe v. Wade

The US Supreme Court released its decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization on Friday, voting to overturn Roe v. Wade — the 1973 ruling that guaranteed federal constitutional protections of abortion rights. This most recent case, which was heard by the Court in December 2021, centered on a Mississippi law banning abortion if the “probable gestational age of the unborn human” is more than 15 weeks. This ruling comes after a draft decision document that signaled this outcome leaked on May 2. 

Wash. Compost hails far-left fake justices

CLIP 11: (Wash. Post article, Dec 1, 2021: Supreme Court seems inclined to uphold Mississippi abortion law that would undermine Roe v. Wade) — During Supreme Court oral arguments on Dec. 1, Justice Sonia Sotomayor pointedly refuted several arguments (NO SHE DIDN’T) supporting a Mississippi anti-abortion law. (Video: The Washington Post) … 

• “Viability” — Casey and Roe 

• Marbury vs. Madison 

Sonia Sotomayor, evil woman

(History) Aug 8, 2009: ​​Sonia Sotomayor is sworn in as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court - HISTORY 

Sotomayor was the first Supreme Court justice nominated by President Barack Obama, who had taken office the previous January. The choice of a Hispanic woman by the nation's first non-white president led to a backlash that set the tone for her confirmation hearings. In particular, a comment she had made in 2001 about "a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences" being a better-qualified than being "a white male who hasn't lived that life" rankled her opponents. Nearly every Republican on the Senate Judicial Committee—all of whom were white men—brought up the comment during their questioning, while pundits speculated about Sotomayor's impartiality and even accused her of being racist. Nonetheless, she was easily confirmed by a Democrat majority and nine RINOs of the Senate's 40 Republicans.

In addition to becoming the first Hispanic Supreme Court justice, Sotomayor was the third woman named to the bench. The following year, Justice Elena Kagan would become the fourth. Since her appointment, Sotomayor has been notable for her forceful dissent in several cases regarding racial discrimination, as well as siding with the majority in a 5-4 decision that upheld the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare).

(5/15/09) Lecture: 'A Latina Judge's Voice' - The New York Times 

… Lecture in 2001, delivered at the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, by appeals court judge Sonia Sotomayor. It was published in the Spring 2002 issue of Berkeley La Raza Law Journal, a symposium issue entitled "Raising the Bar: Latino and Latina Presence in the Judiciary and the Struggle for Representation," and it is reproduced here with permission from the journal.

"A Latina Judge's Voice" – By Sonia Sotomayor 

(July 14, 2009) Sotomayor Explains "Wise Latina" Comment - CBS News 

"I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life," Sotomayor said in a speech at 2001 at the University of California, Berkeley, law school. She made similar statements at other such events.

"I was trying to inspire (students) to believe their experiences would enrich the legal system," Sotomayor said Tuesday. "I was also trying to inspire them to believe they could become anything they wanted to become, just as I have."

The Supreme Court might overturn Roe. It took decades of scorched-earth conservative politics to get here. YAH OK (Wash. Post, Dec 2, 2021)

The liberal justices repeatedly warned that this case could destroy the court itself

Given all this, consider the dramatic and repeated warnings by the liberal justices during oral argument in Dobbs that a ruling upholding Mississippi’s abortion ban would be seen by the public as a political, not a legal decision; that to “overrule precedent” on account of “political pressure” would result in a “loss of confidence in the judiciary” and “subvert the Court’s legitimacy.” Sotomayor noted that the sponsors of the bill themselves acknowledged that they had written the bill to cater to the new Trump-appointed conservative justices and asked, “Will this institution survive the stench that this creates in the public perception that the Constitution and its reading are just political acts?”

By politicizing the court, conservatives have won big policy victories in gun rights, campaign finance, labor and curtailing voting, among others. They might win on abortion, too. But by pursuing these policy victories at all costs, they may end up undermining the very institution that they have worked to control. If the public views the court as nothing more than politicians in robes, then the Supreme Court itself will have committed legitimacy suicide. As Justice Stephen G. Breyer warns, “That’s what kills us as an American institution.”

The Supreme Court is taking suspect science seriously. Conservative groups have worked for years for that.  (Wash. Post, Dec 15, 2021)

Various organizations fight science by peddling doubt and discord on topics such as climate change, covid-19 and abortion (Analysis by Alison Gash and Joshua C. Wilson) 

Earlier this month, as the Supreme Court heard oral arguments over Mississippi’s restrictive abortion law in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, the justices gave serious consideration to dubious science. This was not the first time.

For decades, right-wing funders and advocates have invested in institutions and individual researchers that will question scientific consensus and advance unproven theories. The resulting misinformation has distorted discussions of climate change, covid-19 and other issues. The news media, the White House, Congress, executive agencies and many other institutions have launched initiatives to correct the record and improve public understanding.

For years, partisans have been fighting over whether accepted science should guide decisions on thorny policy issues such as climate change, vaccines, contraception and partisan gerrymandering. Conservative policymakers regularly dismiss scientific findings as “fake news.” When battles over laws touching on these subjects reach the courts, judges aren’t necessarily equipped to discern which scientific claims are reliable and which are disreputable assertions

Roe v. Wade, the landmark abortion rights case, established a woman’s right to abortion before “viability” — the point at which a fetus could survive outside the uterus, which is generally considered to occur at 23 or 24 weeks. Mississippi’s law bans abortion after 15 weeks. In the Dobbs oral arguments, attorneys and justices debated over whether viability was an objectively meaningful line. Arguing for abortion clinics that are challenging the law, attorney Julie Rikelman called viability a “principled line” because it is “objectively verifiable and doesn’t require the court to resolve the philosophical issues at stake.” …. 

GAY KISS CRAP

CLIP 12: Oklahoma theater warns viewers of controversial scene in 'Lightyear' | CNN affiliate KTUL … 1:30 

(CNN) QUOTE: “The management of this theater discovered after booking 'Lightyear' that there is a same-sex kissing scene within the first 30 minutes of the Pixar movie. We will do all we can to fast forward through that scene, but it might not be exact.” 

-- A sign posted at a movie theater in Oklahoma, warning about a same-sex kiss in the new Disney/Pixar film "Lightyear." The notice outside of the 89er Theater in Kingfisher cautioned parents about a scene that depicts two female characters sharing a brief kiss (GROSS!). 

After the sign stirred widespread debate online and in the community, the owners of the theater told CNN that the notice was removed and that the scene had not been censored in any showings. SHAMEFUL! 

Several countries, including Malaysia, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, have banned "Lightyear" from theaters over its inclusion of the same-sex kiss.

—

Thanks, all!