Trump: Sotomayor and Ginsburg Are Biased Against Trump! (Hake News, Tue. 2/25/20)
See The Hake Report from today… Hake News, end of Hour 1, Tuesday, February 25, 2020 - coming up on 7 AM US PST
Trump calls out “Justice” Sotomayor for attacking conservative judges as “biased.” (We need to oust all of these liberal judges like Sonia, Amy Berman Jackson, Ginsburg, Kagan, etc.)
The far-left foreign outlet The Independent claims: It is alleged that Ms Ginni Thomas, the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas), is part of a network of conservative activists called Groundswell, which has close ties to Trump and senior administration officials. They reportedly compiled lists of “disloyal” government officials it wants sacked. Extreme far-left website Axios (founded by the founder of Politico, also in bed with HBO) reports that Ms Ginni Thomas has passed the group’s recommendations on to President Trump.
One of the memos written by a Groundswell member was on former District of Columbia US Attorney Jessie Liu (J-E-S-S-I-E, a female), who had her nomination for a top role in the Treasury withdrawn by the president earlier this month. A source familiar with the document told Axios that Ms Liu’s alleged misdeeds included not charging Andrew McCabe, the former deputy director of the FBI, and signing a document asking for jail time for Michael Flynn, Mr Trump’s former national security adviser. GOOD! SOUNDS LIKE AN UNDESERVING WOMAN!
Among those listed by Axios is Dan Bongino, a former Secret Service agent who makes regular appearances on Fox News. He is thought to have been proposed for a role in Homeland Security or counterterrorism. HE’S OK.
Ms Ginni Thomas has been criticised for ALLEGEDLY plugging overtly partisan messages (NO PROOF), which some suggest is inappropriate for the spouse of a Supreme Court justice. The Independent FALSELY calls her “hard right,” saying: She and other hard-right activists met with Mr Trump in January, according to a New York Times report. During the meeting, Mr Trump is said to have been largely silent while the group denounced women in the military and transgender people. GOOD!
The Supreme Court voted on Friday evening to allow a new rule which limits the ability of low-income immigrants to enter the US. After the decision, which passed by five votes to four, Justice Sonia Sotomayor criticised the court for being biased in favour of the Trump administration.* SHE’S BIASED IN FAVOR OF EVIL!
(Fox News) President Trump says: Supreme Court Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg should recuse themselves from cases dealing with his admin GREAT NEWS!
Real Donald Trump tweeted: “Sotomayor accuses GOP appointed Justices of being biased in favor of Trump.” @IngrahamAngle @FoxNews This is a terrible thing to say. Trying to “shame” some into voting her way? She never criticized Justice Ginsberg when she called me a “faker”. Both should recuse themselves.. ....on all Trump, or Trump related, matters! While “elections have consequences”, I only ask for fairness, especially when it comes to decisions made by the United States Supreme Court!
So (Fox News) VIDEO President Trump accuses Justice Sotomayor of trying to 'shame' people into voting her way
The next morning Trump reiterated when asked about his tweets: “I just thought it was so inappropriate, such a terrible statement for a Supreme Court justice,” he said. “She’s trying to shame people with perhaps a different view into voting her way, and that’s so inappropriate.” SO GOOD I LOVE THIS PRESIDENT!
Trump rips a Supreme Court justice, attacks CNN, and opines on Harvey Weinstein as he departs India …
*CNN highlighted Justice Sonia Sotomayor's dissent that called out the government for repeatedly asking the Supreme Court to allow controversial policies to go into effect. Sotomayor castigated her conservative colleagues for being too eager to side with the Trump administration.
AWESOME White House video: President Trump Holds a Press Availability
Sonia Sotomayor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, both of whom sit on the U.S. Supreme Court, have a severe anti-Trump bias.
End of Hour 2, Tuesday, February 25, 2020 - Coming up on 8 AM PT (I host The Hake Report at 9 AM on my channels, after Jesse’s show!)
Harvey Weinstein is called “guilty” — NYC DA Cyrus Vance, Jr. (A DEMOCRAT), bashed men and kissed up to women!
(Drudge) WEINSTEIN was declared GUILTY OF SEX CRIMES… so claims some jury. He reportedly kept saying under his breath, “but I’m innocent,” according to his attorney.
He’s been HOSPITALIZED WITH CHEST PAINS…
He FACES 5 TO 29 YEARS… CONVICTED ON ASSAULT, RAPE… — third-degree rape.
NY Post headline reads “Harvey Weinstein verdict brings relief for his victims” (OR SO-CALLED VICTIMS!) it’s an article by Maureen Callahan who writes: “Harvey Weinstein’s victims, and those who believe them [OF WHOM HAKE IS NOT ONE], finally got their Hollywood ending: the dethroned Hollywood mogul led out of a courtroom in handcuffs.” SMH. “On Monday, after nearly a week of deliberations, the jury returned its verdict: guilty on two counts, rape and a criminal sex act. Weinstein, who spent his evenings and weekends throughout the trial partying, his days bantering with press and ignoring admonitions by his trial judge, was immediately remanded to jail.” SMH. Maureen says: “He will likely never get out.”
Maureen asked: Would a jury of seven men and five women unanimously believe that Mimi Haleyi or Jessica Mann, two attractive women who dreamed of working in the entertainment industry, who then kept in affectionate contact with their attacker for years, who asked him for favors and accepted his gifts, were actually victims of sexual assault? THAT’S INSANE! The prosecution apparently showed naked photos of Weinstein.
Former actress Jessica Mann testified she had sex with Weinstein in 2016, even though she claimed he “raped” her in a Midtown Manhattan hotel in 2013. This testimony was just three weeks ago and only one day after Mann had such a severe panic attack on the stand that she was removed. “I do want the jury to know he is my rapist,” she said the next day. BUNCH OF PHONY DRAMA! And the jury believed her!
Maureen writes that “this verdict — imperfect though it may be, finding Weinstein not guilty on two counts of predatory sexual assault — has shattered the notion that there is a perfect rape victim.” SHE SOUNDS LIKE A BLM SUPPORTER!*
Maureen celebrates that: “A jury with more men than women realized that a victim of sexual assault, especially one who feels her attacker wields continuous, real-world power over her fate, might have reason to remain in contact with him, to continue to have sex or profess love.” PURE EVIL! SHE’S GREEDY FOR AN ACTING JOB AND WOULD RATHER DO WRONG FOR CAREER THAN PROTECT HER DIGNITY. THAT’S HER FAULT!
Mimi Haleyi, then a production assistant, testified that she kept up a relationship with Weinstein after he assaulted her in 2006 because she needed work (THAT’S LAME THERE’S OTHER WORK OUT THERE!), and later had sex with him even though she didn’t want to. THAT’S YOUR FAULT! “I believe I was trying to regain some sort of power or something,” she said.
In a 2017 email, Jessica Mann wrote to Weinstein, “I love you, I always do, but I hate feeling like a b—y call.” On the stand, Mann admitted asking Weinstein for help obtaining membership in the ultra-exclusive Soho House, with him writing back, “Of course.” She also admitted to seeking advice from Weinstein and asking him, a year after the rape, to meet her mother.
*THE FAR-LEFT ACTIVISTS LIKE #MeToo and #BlackLivesMatter SAY THERE’S NO PERFECT VICTIM IN ORDER TO EXCUSE BLACKS RESISTING ARREST AND FIGHTING COPS AND BEING THUGS! SO THEY’RE EXCUSING LYING WOMEN WHO CONTINUE TO HAVE SEX WITH THE MAN THEY CALL A RAPIST!
Donna Rotunno: After breakups, the person you decided to reach out to was the person you say sexually assaulted you?
Mann: Yes.
Rotunno: You want the gentleman and ladies of this jury to know that the man you asked to sponsor you [to Soho House] was your rapist?
Mann: I do want the jury to know he is my rapist, and I want to explain the dynamic.
Maureen Callahan writes: Consider that by this point, Mann appeared defeated. Her voice and demeanor indicated that she knew this was almost impossible to understand, but she had to placate Weinstein to “protect” herself. “From my point of view,” she said, she couldn’t cease contact if she wanted a career.
Maureen writes: Again: What was the likelihood a jury would unanimously believe Mann? It’s not as if they could consider the other 80-plus accusers, all with similar stories.
--