09/21/20 Mon. Tulsa Cops Hit by PUNK! Training? Glenn Beck; RBG
Hake reports about the Tulsa cop killer from late June 2020
The Hake Report, Monday, September 21, 2020:
Horrible incident happened to police in Tulsa, OK, June 29. Capital punishment on table for suspect/punk.
Glenn Beck wants a billion 'Americans' like Vox’s Matt Yglesias. Beck is a kiss-up!
RBG was pro-ending the baby in the womb, pro-'equality,' hated nature
Other headlines: Bar owner ends his own life amid charges! BLM 'activist' with a “Justice for Breonna Taylor” T-shirt commits a horrible act at a police-friendly bar against three seemingly random people!
TIME STAMPS
0:00 show begins
3:51 Tulsa, OK police incident
29:48 William from MI
42:32 Samuel from Sweden
49:01 Super Chats, libertarians
52:10 T from AL, judgment
54:45 Glenn Beck, arg
1:01:14 Break!
1:04:15 Libertarians, anarchists
1:11:08 Julian from Irvine, CA
1:22:08 Mary from San Antonio, TX
1:39:08 Ginsburg
1:50:57 Other headlines
1:59:45 Thanks, all!
CALLERS
William from Michigan says the Tulsa police officers violated the man’s rights!
David from Alberta, Canada thanks James for the show! Thank you!
Samuel from Sweden tells a couple of interesting stories about untrustworthy people!
T from Alabama – phone messes up! What is James’s idea of “judgment”?
Julian from Irvine, CA talks about the Compton officers ambushed and the argument he had with his brother. His brother claims the officers are part of a very edgy group.
Mary from San Antonio, TX remarks on Glenn Beck and James’ comments on him.
Rick from Hampton, VA, and another caller both hang up before James gets to them!
HAKE LINKS
LIVE VIDEO: DLive | Periscope | Facebook | Twitch | YouTube (NOT LIVE TODAY)
PODCAST: Apple | Podcast Addict | Castbox | Stitcher | Spotify | PodBean | Google …
SUPPORT: SubscribeStar | Patreon | Teespring | SUPER CHAT: Streamlabs | DLive
Call in! 888-775-3773, live Monday through Friday 9 AM (Los Angeles) https://thehakereport.com/show
Also see Hake News from JLP’s show today.
Disturbing story from Tulsa (censored)
CLIP from Instagram: White man shoots two cops (killing one) and lives to talk about it
This video is from Tulsa on June 29, 2020. The driver, David Ware shot Sgt. Craig Johnson and Officer Aurash Zarkeshan at point blank range while the struggles with him during a traffic stop. Johnson died from his injuries. The cops wanted to tow Ware’s car because it had expired tags and he had no proof of insurance. Johnson and Ware had a run-in months earlier.
(The Sun) A video released [last] week shows David Anthony Ware, 33, at a traffic stop where he appeared to shoot Tulsa police Sgt Craig Johnson (black, I think) and injure Officer Aurash Zarkeshan.
Glenn Beck is weak!
(Revolver says...) Glenn Beck just lost the plot…
Other headlines
(Revolver / The Gateway Pundit) BLM “ACTIVIST” WEARING BREONNA TAYLOR SHIRT WALKS INTO BAR, MURDERS THREE PEOPLE…
(Revolver / The Gateway Pundit) TRUMP SUPPORTER COMMITS SUICIDE AFTER GETTING CAUGHT IN LEFT’S INJUSTICE SYSTEM…
Ginsburg was pro-abortion
(TIME) What Ruth Bader Ginsburg Said About Abortion and Roe v. Wade
“It is essential to woman’s equality with man that she be the decisionmaker, that her choice be controlling,” Ginsburg told Senators during her four days of questioning by the Senate Judiciary Committee. “If you impose restraints that impede her choice, you are disadvantaging her because of her sex.”
… Ginsburg said that she believed it would have been easier for the public to understand why the Constitution protected abortion rights if it the matter had been framed as one of equal protection rather than privacy. And in fact, there was a specific case she had in mind as one that should have driven the national conversation, instead of letting Roe carry that weight.
She told the Senators that she “first thought long and hard” about abortion rights when, as a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), she took on Struck v. Secretary of Defense, a case that was on the Supreme Court’s calendar during the same term that Roe was decided. Susan Struck was an Air Force Captain who got pregnant while serving in Vietnam and sued the Air Force after it said she would have to either get an abortion at the base hospital or leave if she wanted to have the child. She told the Air Force that she didn’t want to get an abortion; she wanted to use the vacation days that she had saved up to give birth and then put the baby up for adoption because abortion violated her Roman Catholic faith.
Here’s how Ginsburg explained her approach — that sex discrimination includes discrimination because of pregnancy — to the Senate Judiciary Committee:
First, that the applicable Air Force regulations — if you are pregnant you are out unless you have an abortion — violated the equal protection principle, for no man was ordered out of service because he had been the partner in a conception, no man was ordered out of service because he was about to become a father.
Next, then we said that the Government is impeding, without cause, a woman’s choice whether to bear or not to bear a child. Birth was Captain Struck’s personal choice, and the interference with it was a violation of her liberty, her freedom to choose, guaranteed by the due process clause.
Finally, we said the Air Force was involved in an unnecessary interference with Captain Struck’s religious belief.
So all three strands were involved in Captain Struck’s case. The main emphasis was on her equality as a woman vis-à-vis a man who was equally responsible for the conception, and on her personal choice, which the Government said she could not have unless she gave up her career in the service.
In that case, all three strands were involved: her equality right, her right to decide for herself whether she was going to bear the child, and her religious belief. So it was never an either/or matter, one rather than the other. It was always recognition that one thing that conspicuously distinguishes women from men is that only women become pregnant; and if you subject a woman to disadvantageous treatment on the basis of her pregnant status, which was what was happening to Captain Struck, you would be denying her equal treatment under the law…
The decision whether or not to bear a child is central to a woman’s life, to her well-being and dignity. It is a decision she must make for herself. When Government controls that decision for her, she is being treated as less than a fully adult human responsible for her own choices.
Struck lost in the lower courts, and the Supreme Court agreed on Oct. 24, 1972, that the case should be heard — but that never happened, because the Air Force waived Struck’s discharge and allowed her to remain in the service before that date rolled around.
--
Thanks, all!